Installation art: The Bigger the Better?
Installation art's greatest benefit is also its greatest downfall. Installation art pieces are generally massive, and nearly impossible to move. Furthermore, installation art does not have the same effect if read about or seen in photos. One must witness the piece firsthand to truly experience it. However, installation art has not always been a field dominated by massive art pieces. Most early installation works were more concerned with engagement of the viewers than with size. Presently, artists must compete with larger-than-life media. Anish Kapoor's 12 ft. high "Cloud Gate" within Millennium Park in Chicago, Illinois is one example of art centered on size. Many other works of art, especially those which fall into the field of appropriation art, are predominantly known for their enormity. I prefer art which focuses on meaning, on leaving an emotional impact on the viewer rather than amaze the viewer by size. History's greatest works of art are simple and small. For instance, most visitors are shocked by the small size of the Mona Lisa. Most expect this famous painting to be a lavish portrait that consumes most of the wall it hangs upon. Artists must work to create work with substance, not just size.
"Cloud Gate" Anish Kapoor
-Tina
No comments:
Post a Comment